Under review after revision.

Under review after revision Now status of manuscript is changed to Editor Assigned again. 5 months ago. The status changed to With Editor on February 28 and to Under Review on March 2/3. Jul 10, 2016 · Recently I submitted minor revision to springer journal. 此过程的等待较为漫长。当然之前各步骤也可能很慢，要看编辑的处理情况。 总结： 这个过程也不要轻易催稿，一般都是已邀请审稿人和已送审等过程中。如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会 decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。 What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. Till then, it is showing "Decision in Process". Mar 2, 2018 · 先日、minor revisionで改訂し、提出から約半年以上、editorial assessmentから変化がなかったstatusがようやく変化があり、under reviewとなりました。 何回か送っていたリマインダーの返事には、担当editorの推薦は決まっているが、senior editorの採決待ちとのことでした。 このため、このunder reviewはsenior 如果是大修，那么至少会多一步，副主编需要会将论文作者修改后的修改稿发给审稿人进行二次审稿（Revision Under Review），而不是直接自行决定，这个过程中如果改得不够理想，也有被拒稿的可能。如果改得还行，审稿人的二次审稿意见都是小修或者接收，那么 May 14, 2015 · This is the right answer. 5 minutes!!! after that email the status on the website changed, showing pending May 16, 2024 · Under Review. ' Learn what these editorial decisions precisely mean, and how to react. Jul 15, 2019 · Thus the subsequent status “under review” means that the manuscript has been sent out for review. And claiming for the paper to be accepted, only for the admissions committee to find out that it’s in fact still under review would count against you in the process. May 16, 2023 · Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Required Reviews Complete ：这个状态表明审稿意见已经返回给编辑。这个状态持续时间一般为几小时到几天，不会太久。 Oct 6, 2020 · That is to say that some journals may have the status of the submitted paper as under review whilst they assess its suitability for review and the status in review when it’s actually being assessed by reviewers. Reconsideration after major revision. How can I add this new article citation to the first manuscript during the period under review? If the first manuscript was accepted can I add this citation at the page proof stage? Sep 19, 2016 · Usually I find in the author's guideline an average review time of the last three years or so. Jul 27, 2020 · Now, you haven’t mentioned whether there were any status updates before ‘Under Review. So we sent query to the editor. ' Now, after three weeks, the status date of the manuscript has changed, but the status remains 'Reviewers Assigned. Reject 论文被拒，改投期刊。 Jul 13, 2021 · Q:一审小修后接收，就两条意见，两天后修改后上传，状态持续一周under review，难道还要返还给审稿人？还是又要再次找新的审稿人？ A:收到修改后的稿件，编辑要么送去新一轮的外审，要么自己审。 大修的话，编辑通… Sep 13, 2017 · Currently under review at the International Journal of Foo. Under review. Under review. May 30, 2021 · The status of my manuscript is currently "under review" after a minor revision and I had resubmitted the revision. Cn helpdesk@cwauthors. Nov 8, 2015 · In general, however, my feeling about requests for revision, even major revision, is that they're generally good news. Some examples include “editor assigned,” “reviewers invited,” “under review,” “review complete,” “decision pending,” and others. But our paper status is Technical Check In Progress. To date, the status is “under review”. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. May 23, 2020 · Sometimes, a reviewer may pull out after being assigned, for reasons of a lack of time, mismatch (with their subject area), or conflict of interest. Apr 15, 2019 · My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. What I have heard was that minor revision does not require another round of revision in most of the accept after minor revision( 小修后接收，withour re-review不需要再送审) －reconsideration after major revision. 活跃概况. In the second-round review after major revisions, as informed by the assistant editor, the reviewer agreed for the first and second-round reviews didn’t submit the second-round review report in a period of nearly two weeks, which is quite rare based on our experience. The time it takes for a manuscript to Dec 4, 2024 · 2. The next status should make things clearer. Once a paper hits at least a major revision, it's highly likely to be eventually accepted if the authors just keep answering the requests for improvement, and will likely be the stronger for it. Now, again it May 26, 2022 · 2. Answer: After two revisions (the first major and the second minor), the Editor Assigned status means that the manuscript is with the Associate Editor (AE) to review the second round of changes and also the manuscript as a whole. From my own experience I once reveiced in a row major revision, minor revision, major revision. Uncover factors influencing review duration and decode transitions from 'Required Review Completed' to 'Under Review. However, this change should not be cause for Under review ：审稿中，此过程的等待较为漫长。这个过程可能是整个发表过程中最花时间的一步，一般需要1-2个月的时间。 7. It’s only when the status changes to ‘Under Review,’ as you have rightly understood, that the actual review begins. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. With a typical ScholarOne configuration, "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" means that it is actually out with (at least some) reviewers, while "Under Review" would instead mean the previous stage, where it is being considered by the handling editor(s) and might still be rejected without review. Three weeks later, the status has changed to Decision in Process. October 5: I submitted the revised manuscript. They have given a major revision decision twice. I spoke with Elsevier’s journal assistance via online chat. Jun 9, 2019 · The fact that the status of your manuscript had changed from “editor assigned” to “under review” indicates that your manuscript has cleared the initial screening and reviewers were invited to review your manuscript. My revised manuscript (after minor revision) is still under review for more than 3 months and I have not any response yet. Mar 28, 2024 · 一篇SCI论文诞生后，就会去投稿，但在投出去后，可能会收到各种不同的结果，比如： 收到（receive ）、拒绝（Reject）、修改后重投（Revise and resubmit）、小修后接受（Accept with minor revisions）、直接接受… Jan 7, 2019 · I have a paper on an Elsevier journal with "accept, minor revision". this status is not mentioned in Elsevier site! I'm confused about this statuses. ' What does this mean? The meaning of ‘manuscript under review’ When a manuscript is ‘under review’, it has been sent to external peer reviewers and the journal editor awaits these peer reviewers’ assessments. There were 3-4 little modifications required by referees. In such instances, the editor seeks an alternative reviewer to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. Usually, peer review for a revised paper takes shorter time compared to the original manuscript. October 25: The If you have Reviewer Selection or Journal Editorial Office support set up on your journal, you can also seek their help at revision and re-review. Did the second review after the minor revisions were done take longer than the first? Or was the first also long (80 days sounds quite long)? Thanks anyway. Accept after minor revision小修后接收，without re-review不需要再送审。 3. July 1: I made the initial submission. Two of the three reviewer completed their reviews within a week whereas the third one has taken about 2 months but still has not submitted his/her report which makes Apr 21, 2017 · Under Review. Aug 27, 2021 · Whenever this happens (at least taking in account the papers I have submitted to other journals) the authors make the first revision, then the revision is sent to the reviewers again, so they can look at the second version of the paper and see if they agree with the revisions, right? 4 days ago · lanhan8103的个人资料 ,科学网. After the review scores come back, a manuscript then Yeah I only saw pending recommendation, never “final” before we got the acceptance email. However, it was under review for 5 months. While the judicial system strives for accuracy, mistakes in judgement or procedure can undermine justice. 所有邀请的评审专家完成了对论文的评审，并提交了他们的意见。编辑将综合所有评审意见，准备做出 Jun 20, 2023 · The status of my manuscript is showing Decision in Process for almost two months. But at my surprise, Elsevier management system is now displaying 'Under review' again. After submitting their manuscripts to academic journals, authors receive one of several editorial decisions: 'desk reject', 'revise and resubmit', 'major revisions', 'minor revisions', or 'paper accepted. I edited my manuscript as they suggested and submitted the revised version. August 12: The status changed to Under Review. Even after minor reviews, it can take several weeks or even months for reviewers and editors to look at the paper again. for 3 days), when they found something missing. 2'16). g. Congratulations! Hi all, I am wondering how the minor revision sent back to review finally worked out. After making the necessary adjustments, I resubmitted the revised manuscript on the 21st of November. Jan 18, 2020 · Editor Assigned status after two revisions. So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the invitation. After sending the query, the reviewers' comments came just within 4 days suggesting a minor revision. Dec 4, 2017 · It is possible. (1) Some journals carry an internal review firstly before sending the manuscript for external review. 此过程的等待较为漫长。当然之前各步骤也可能很慢，要看编辑的处理情况。 总结： 这个过程也不要轻易催稿，一般都是已邀请审稿人和已送审等过程中。如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会 decline，编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。 昨天按照两个审稿人的意见修改了下投了，今天看状态又变成Under review了，难道小修后还要送审？求解惑!有点小紧张，投文章的时候都没有现在修回紧张！ Reviewer: 1 Recommendation: Publish after major revisions. However, the change of status back to “reviewers assigned” indicates that at least one of the original reviewers might have declined the invitation to review after going through your manuscript in detail. I know firsthand how excruciating this process is because it’s almost like your work is in limbo, and you have no idea what to expect. Sometimes, however, the editor will send the manuscript back to the original reviewers to get their feedback about the acceptability of the revised manuscript. Contents The meaning of a 'desk-rejected' paperWhat to do if your paper is desk-rejectedThe meaning of 'revise and Feb 4, 2021 · I have submitted my manuscript to a Springer journal. However, this change should not be cause for So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the invitation. The manuscript was sent back to the reviewers as it was a major revision. (大修之后再送审，即要再经过审稿流程3－6) －reject and resubmit (论文现在状态不能接受，但可以修改后重新再投。要重新经过审稿流程1－6) －reject （没希望了，改投把) The "decision in process" is the editor choosing if the next step is acceptance, revision, or rejection. We oversee this process to e After review you may get two options major or minor revision. ” What does this mean? Does it indicate the manuscript is still under major revision? Reply Jan 14, 2025 · The result of the first round of peer review was ‘major revision’ and the result of the second round was ‘minor revision’ and all reviewers report form is “YES (x)” Currently, my revised manuscript is in the ‘Pending Decision (almost 3 days)’ As the second round was completed rapidly, I assumed the ‘Pending Decision’ would Jul 8, 2019 · After resubmitting my revised manuscript on 20th of June, the status changed to 'under review' after only 4 days and then after 6 days (on 30th of June) it changed to 'required reviews completed. But here the chances are 50:50 depending on the reviewers comments. The new reviewers recommended rejection based on points we argue were incorrect. Aug 4, 2021 · I think awaiting reviewers' scores after revision means that your response to the queries raise is under review to ensure that you have actually responded accordingly and adequately Cite Get help There are several decisions that authors may receive after submitting their paper to one of the Society’s journals: Reject without review: The Action Editor has rejected the paper without sending it for peer review. Comments: What does "awaiting reviewer scores" means after revision? Question. A week has passed since I submitted the revision, but the status in ScholarOne remains unchanged. Regarding your question about the deadline assigned to reviewers, this would vary across journals. Reject and resubmit 论文目前不能接收，但可以修改后重新再投，从头再来。 5. It can last from a few weeks to several months. I'm in a similar situation at the moment. The reviewers have read the manuscript before and documented critical paragraphs. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. ” After submitting the revised manuscript, the status now says “Revised Version Under Review. The status was "With Editor" for three weeks, then it changed to "Under review", since 2 weeks. Required reviews completed: Minimum number of reviews has been received. The status “under review” means that the reviewers had accepted the invitation and peer review process had begun. It is important new reviewers respect previous review comments and the efforts the author has made to revise the paper; Ideally, any significant changes should already have been requested in the original review – this subsequent review should be to ensure that the changes have been made, rather than for raising additional issues. Souhir Masmoudi. One reason to list your pending submissions can be to show what you have been working on in the last months, but it will not count as "achievement", even if you mention that it got an "accepted with major revisions". The status was "with Editor" until 2 weeks and then it went to "under review. Aug 25, 2021 · I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. After 50 days of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested” and that the new version was required within one month. I had received the following recommendation: accept subject to optional revision. some journals can move the status when one review has been submitted, while others might ask for 2 or 3 or more. When the editor gets all the reviews back a decision is made (accept, reject, accept with revision, more review,). 4. Sep 30, 2019 · For example, journals can configure status changes that give authors transparency into various stages within the review process that the submission will move through. We sent the manuscript with minor revision but now it is again under revision for 15 days. After second revision, the submission’s status changed from "major revision" to "with editor". From your query, it seems reviewers have been assigned for your manuscript. For all subsequent follow ups I received the following reply “the responsible editor already decided to recommend, but the decision by a senior editor is Mar 12, 2021 · This list will guide your revision of the paper. The status was "With Editor" for three weeks, then it changed to "Under review". 再看具体的审稿意见，一般有这么几种： （1）缺项。 Oct 13, 2022 · 从 AE not Assigned、Under Review、AE Assigned、Under Review 到 Evaluation Recommendation，为什么 review 了两次，发生了啥？ 解：多数时候 Under Review 指的是审稿人外审，部分期刊也用它表示编辑在内审，所以才会让人产生以上疑问。 具体可以结合时间节点、前后的稿件状态来 Pending Recommendation 2017-11-09 Under Review 2017-11-08 Under Editor Review 2017-11-08 What was the decision finally? If "Pending Recommendation" comes immediately after "Under Review", then the paper was never sent to the reviewers and it will either be desk rejected, or in some rare cases the editor wants the authors to make some changes before the paper is sent out for review. Take the list of comments and suggestions and group them into categories, and then identify which require a minor revision and which require a major revision. Université de Saint-Etienne. Sep 19, 2016 · Usually I find in the author's guideline an average review time of the last three years or so. Some rapid publication journals might give 10-15 days for reviewers to get back with their reports; however, for most journals the review time is longer. Any article submitted to any journal goes under review if found suitable and within the scope of that journal. ' Is 8 days a long time to provide a final decision especially since the reviewers' responses were rather quick? Thank you for your answer. After a couple of months of the peer review process, the response was “major revision has been requested”. Apr 21, 2025 · Finally, editors need to assess these reviews and formulate a decision. 编辑部或审稿人在审稿，前者对稿件录用倾向做预期评估。含义与“peer review”不完全一致。此时论文是由同行评审员进行外审，因为审稿是无偿的工作加上需要付出许多精力，这个过程可能是发表过程找那个耗时最长的一步。 May 3, 2025 · 9 November 2024. The various status updates are as follows. Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. What does that mean? Does it mean the manuscript has been assigned to a new reviewer and Jan 1, 2023 · For a minor revision, the editor may decide to send the revised manuscript to the peer reviewer for a final check or review the manuscript themselves if the changes were indeed minor. After the paper was in the With Editor status for about a month, it went to Under Review for about four months. When you submit a revision, the editor will send it back out to the original reviewers (assuming they agree). I hope you will get the reviews of your paper within the review time of the journal (after Feb. You may also notice that the date associated with the status of under review changes even though the actual status does not. Kindly suggest what can be done in this regard. Mar 5, 2018 · I received “minor revision” for my paper and resubmitted the revised manuscript. Dec 30, 2019 · Thus, it is difficult to tell how much time the final decision will take after a major revision. 9k次。本文详细介绍了学术论文从提交到最终接受或拒绝的各个阶段状态，包括Submitted to Journal、With Editor、Under Review等多个关键环节，并解释了每个状态的含义及可能的后续进展。 We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. I guess it must mean that the editor wasn't too sure about the changes, and wanted to have another Jan 24, 2021 · On December 5, I received a minor revision decision from one reviewer and a major revision decision from the other. After major revision we have submitted the manuscript back and it went to with editor to under review after one day and to required reviews completed after 2 weeks and then again to under review after 1 day. After 1 week, the submission’s status changed to "under review" and two weeks after that the status changed to "with editor". Feb 2, 2023 · Typically, when a manuscript has been "under review" for more than 7 months in a journal, it means that the review process is taking longer than expected. the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then 然后，这些审稿人需要足够的时间来全面评审您的稿件。最终，编辑需要评估这些审稿意见并给出决定。特别是“ Under review（正在审稿）” 状态包含很多步骤，虽然您的稿件状态在编辑过程中没有显示进展，但是在这一审稿过程中可能正在发生很多活动。 Jun 13, 2018 · From wht I understand, you have re-submitted your manuscript after revision to the same journal and the status has changed from ‘Under review’ to ‘Revision’. This stage is often the longest one in the manuscript publication process. 大修之后再送审，要再经历一遍评审阶段。 4. Asked 4th Aug, 2021; the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then Recently, I have received a major revision decision for my paper. I'll presume this is different than what you saw during the prior round of review, however, and it would in fact be unusual for a paper to be stuck with an editor for two months without going out for review. Papers that are published independently while your manuscript is under review or under revision at Nature Communications are also not considered to compromise Decision after review and revision. Then, I have made all the necessary modifications and resubmitted. Sep 19, 2017 · After a month, I received comments from three reviewers requesting minor revisions. It's impossible to know what "Editor Assigned" means without knowing the particulars of the journal's system. The paper is under second revision but first technical revision. – Apr 13, 2018 · Only one reviewer was assigned after second revision and the paper is under review for last seven months. IMHO, "in revision" should be used to emphasize the phase between submission and acceptance or any other decisions by editor(s). Entrants who have already submitted a manuscript to IEEE Access without a video can still submit a video for inclusion in this Award so long as the video is . Dec 22, 2015 · After getting the minor revision letter, I immediately completed the revision in accordance with the feedback from the reviewers (the suggested changes just involve adding a few sentences) and immediately resubmitted the revision to ScholarOne. Feb 28, 2022 · Under review: When at least one reviewer agrees to review (status change from reviewer assigned to Under review). Jun 20, 2023 · The status of my manuscript is showing Decision in Process for almost two months. Sep 24, 2019 · Based on the nature and extent of revisions, he/she might consider sending it out for another round of review or go through it himself/herself and make a final decision. If the authors revise and resubmit the manuscript after review, the editor will often review the changes to decide if the reviewer comments have been fully addressed. Usually the author is kept informed, but there are often delays in the system as people are busy and not dedicated totally to this one paper to the exclusion of all else. October 25: The status changed to Under Review. etc. I had submitted the revised paper around 16th March 2023. They consider either being with the editor or the reviewers Nov 20, 2018 · I think that under consideration may significate under review through several time steps according to the revision process. After 3 weeks my paper status was changed to "Required reviews completed" but after a day it was changed to "Under review" again. Now, again it Review and Complete the Terms and Conditions: After submitting your manuscript and video through the IEEE Author Portal, entrants should then review and sign the Terms and Conditions. There are several factors that influence the time taken for review, most notably availability of article referees. During the peer review process your article will show a status of ‘Under Review’. Jan 11, 2012 · 文章浏览阅读9. and now after 40 days the status is still in that stage. 15 answers. How can I add this new article citation to the first manuscript during the period under review? If the first manuscript was accepted can I add this citation at the page proof stage? Nov 19, 2020 · After the revision, the paper is sent back to the reviewers for checking the corrections and making their final decisions. ' Dive into the dynamics of manuscript status changes in peer review. Does this mean it got sent to reviewers or the editor is evaluating it? Any experience here? It’s an Elsevier journal. 2. We made the changes requested in the minor revision. After the resubmission was competed the status of the manuscript was finally changed to “under review” after “editorial assessment” after 6 months. For 3-4 days, the status of my manuscript status was showing to be Editor Assigned and after that status changed to Under Review. Some journals show the under review status from the time the paper gets to the editor in chief through to the reviewers. Note that the time it takes for an editor to make a decision on your revision may vary depending on the editor's workload and the time of year. Required Reviews Complete. Dec 24, 2019 · I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. Stage 1: Initial quality check This stage includes checks on authorship, competing interests, ethics approval and plagiarism. If the status changes to “Under review,” it means that your paper has been sent to a reviewer again. In this case, you will notice that the duration of Under Review is relatively short for 1-2 weeks. Nov 27, 2017 · After making corrections I have submitted the revised manuscript around 1. Cite. September 15: I received a major revision decision. e. A third reason for inviting new referees might be a reject from the final reviewer after your minor revision (assuming the editor had send it out again). Just list it as what it is, under review. You’ll typically encounter this status after the “under review” status. Now, again it Dec 19, 2019 · Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. 수정 후 재심(accept with major revision)인 경우, 편집자/심사자의 의견에 따라 대규모의 내용 수정이 불가피하며 추가 심사를 받아야만 한다. Out of the four reviewers, the first suggested minor revision with no further re-review, the second reviewer wanted to see the manuscript in revised form, the third rejected it, and the fourth suggested publication (though he also suggested us to try for a higher impact journal). We would like to show you a description here but the site won’t allow us. They’ll probably inform you on Monday, best of luck with wherever you decide to submit next! In consequence, peer review times do vary per journal. I have not been asked for a revision. " Around 3 weeks later, they updated the status "under review" again. I have submitted a revision to an elsevier journal after incorporating the suggestions from the reviewers. Peer review times vary per journal. Mar 26, 2020 · I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using Editorial Manager on February 27, 2020. September 4: The status changed to Reviews Completed. But sometimes the reviewers do not return to the Editor within the time Oct 1, 2012 · In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to 结论：如果是顶刊，major revision有一定概率被拒；但如果是一般期刊，Accepted=Accept，minor revision = nearly Accepted，major revision = will be accepted soon。 3、常见审稿意见的修改方法. Judges, like all humans, are susceptible to errors. Editorial review team inadvertently sent the revised paper to new reviewers instead of previous reviewers. (same day)-->under review-----(after 16 days)-->decision in After the revision, the paper is sent back to the reviewers for checking the corrections and making their final decisions. After the submission of the second revision, the status was Under Review for 20 days. After that, it changed to 'Under Review. After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it became "Editor assigned" again. Then, the status changed to Required Reviews Completed. But sometimes the reviewers do not return to the Editor within the time Let me show and shortly describe the simple schema of the way of a paper through the system after its submission. It is just guessing. there were two reviewers, reviewer#1 said `The authors have made all the modifications indicated. Appeal, review, and revision are remedies designed to address such errors: Appeal allows a higher court to reassess the decision of a lower court. Reviewers have been invited and the peer review process is underway. Is it still with the associate editor or with the old reviewers. I sent a paper to Journal of Cleaner Production and finally got minor revision after 6months. Oct 1, 2012 · In my field (chemistry), the practice is: for those journals that make a clear distinction between minor and major revision requests, “major revision” means that the paper will have to undergo further review after revision, usually by the same referees, while “minor revision” means that while changes should be made, no further reviewing is needed. After re-submission, the status changed from "under review" to "decision in process". Reject: The paper has been through the peer review process and the May 27, 2020 · After one week, the status changed to 'Reviewers Assigned,' and it remained so for one day. Jul 31, 2015 · While I upvoted your answer (as most others in this thread), I don't think that "in revision" fits this particular situation (where the paper is essentially accepted, while formally tentatively). Identifying revised submissions It was under quality control review until yesterday (i. 用户组: 注册会员 扩展用户组: 博客用户 注册时间: 2010-12-12 13:00; 最后访问: 2025-4-16 21:03 Your article could be submitted to the Associated Editor or Editor-in-Chief for one last review before approval or rejection. This should give you a rough hint to your question. Reject 论文被拒，改投期刊。 Mar 27, 2017 · Is it possible that after sending minor revisions my paper has gone for a fresh review again. Revise your paper. Jan 10, 2025 · Introduction to Appeal, Review, and Revision. On December 22, the status changed to Under Review, and has remained so since then. Especially the status 'Under review' encompasses many steps; while it may appear your manuscript is not progressing through the editorial process, a lot of activities may be happening during this part of the review process. . com Refer a Friend A major revision would normally go back to the same reviewers and they would usually have as much time to review as the original submission. Asked 4th Aug, 2021; the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then Feb 16, 2016 · 5. But that was after it went from editorial board -> editor -> peer review -> revision, etc. Today, another of my articles was accepted. Apr 28, 2019 · After major revision, two reviewers gave me minor revision (only change one word) and the editor was pleased to consider publication. Minor revisions will include formatting or writing suggestions and are typically issues you can easily address. Nov 9, 2020 · I submitted a review paper to a Springer-based journal. I added it, and then today (Friday) at 3pm I received an email that the paper has passed the quality control check and is now moved for evaluation. Still this step is usually faster because the reviewers don't have to be "re-identified" (assuming they agree to review; otherwise it could take longer for a myriad of reasons). It is slightly strange that the status 'Revision' is being displayed now although the submission system did not show this status during the previous rounds of review. Nov 2, 2020 · Meaning of change in status of a revised manuscript from Under Review to With Editor to Under Review For a revised manuscript that was Under Review for 10 days, the status changed to With Editor and then again to Under Review. after that, the status change to with editor and thereafter a decision Dec 27, 2020 · 更新をさぼってしまった。 もうだいぶ前の話だけど、超Minor revisionだった論文を修正し再投稿した。細かい英語の記載ミスの指摘のみだったので、再投稿後すぐに受理されると思っていたが、ステータスがUnder reviewとなり、約2か月後にまたMinor revisionで戻ってきた。 最初の投稿時は査読者が2人 It should take at least a few weeks for re-review and the editor to make a decision after your revision is submitted (if the previous decision was B (minor revisions), then the timelines may be shorter). If the paper is not rejected, there are three possible recommendations: “accept (as is)”, “minor revision”, and “major revision”. What could be the reason for the current status? Is the review process completed or are more reviewers required to [re For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for Apr 8, 2025 · During this period, the status changed to “Pending Major Revision. We have our manuscript reviewed by journal Forests. Something like this: "The paper was initially given a 'minor revision' decision. Apart from that I personally consider a revision review of five months a quite critical time frame already in general. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. Most journals will try to catch this and either reject outright, or assign it to the same AE to handle. On December 20, I submitted the revised article. What does this mean and what is the probability of rejection? Feb 4, 2016 · Also, if the editor already have received a review or two, he/she asks assigned reviewer to provide review strictly within the review period defined by the journal. After that, it changed to Editor Assigned, and has been the same since January 17. Dec 15, 2001 · 수정 후 게재(accept with minor revision)인 경우, 본문의 사소한 내용을 고친 뒤 별도의 심사 없이 논문이 게재된다. About two years ago, I have submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal. The reviews were completed by 23rd March. Apr 18, 2021 · Manuscripts move from "Under review" to "Required Reviews Complete" when all the necessary reviews to make a decision have arrived. Jun 17, 2023 · I would do nothing at this stage. 论文正在进行详细的同行评审。这一过程可能需要数周甚至更长时间，具体取决于评审专家的反馈速度和期刊的审稿流程。 6. One referee submitted their review, but probably more are needed, and there’s no telling how much more time it may take. Basically, it’s neither good news nor bad news, it’s no news, aka crappy user interface. On March 24, it changed to Required Reviews Completed, and then, changed to Decision in Process. The status has been showing " under review " for a month now. Nov 20, 2024 · This article shows the editorial process after Submitting a manuscript to a journal. That in itself will take a bit of time - sometimes the editor doesn't have time to do it immediately, and people could take time to agree. ’ If not, and it directly went to ‘Under Review’ after submission, this indicates the internal check (for aspects such as scope match, novelty factor, quality of the writing, and adherence to guidelines). Now, again it Feb 16, 2016 · 5. Mar 15, 2016 · A rejected paper is sometimes resubmitted to the same journal, after some revisions. ' However, after 15 days, it again changed to 'Reviewers Assigned. Jan 5, 2021 · I had submitted a manuscript to a Springer journal. Mainly, it was only one table which needed amendments. Jun 8, 2023 · Hi, We have submitted our manuscript to an Elsevier journal and it came back with major revision. 让我简要介绍一篇稿子在提交之后经历的审稿过程。 1、Awaiting admin checklist—— Administrator checks if the paper contains all necessary parts and is suitable for a review. Further details are in the video . What is meaning of this change ? Feb 17, 2022 · I sent my research work to an sci indexed journal. I submitted the revisions within a few days, and thought that the editor would deal with them quickly. This is usually journal-dependent, e. kdktc tpuqds taxoq fchzeq ces bav czmz qavoc xct niwv