Awaiting reviewer assignment one month. Let’s take them one by one.

Awaiting reviewer assignment one month I don't recall seeing the "with editor" status in the initial submission stage. The status of the paper changed several times. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online If less than three reviewers agree to review and all the reviewers who were sent the manuscript have responded (agree to review/decline to review), or if the "awaiting reviewer assignment" status lasts for more than a certain period of time (I guess one month), the status will change to "under review". 06. I recently submitted my first paper to a philosophy journal. The status "Awaiting Referee Report" implies that the reviewers are already assigned and review work is in-progress. I submitted the manuscript in early October In this talk, we will explore the critical challenges associated specifically with the assignment of reviewers to submitted papers. This means that the number of reviewers has not reached 3, and the AE *One manuscript can be in multiple queues* • Awaiting Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where reviewers have agreed to review, but have not submitted their review Overdue Reviewer Scores: Manuscripts where an agreed reviewer did not return their review in the allocated time • Make Recommendation: Manuscripts where all reviews have been received and the AE can make a After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It took 3 days for the initial review, 1 month for the first revision, and another month for the second revision. Awaiting allocation: The paper has been assigned to the Editor but has not yet been sent to reviewers (however, the Editor may have assigned the manuscript to an Associate Editor – there is no separate system status to indicate this). Since then, the status has been fluctuating between "awaiting reviewer selection," "awaiting I submitted a paper to a high-level journal (3rd) that uses the SholarOne system. awaiting AE decision, then Awaiting DE decision. The EiC at that time said they'll look For at least one month, my paper's status was "Awaiting ED recommendations," then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer invitation," is it good or bad? Asked by VICTOR VARGAS on 27 Jun, 2018 Answer One month with the editor is too long, more than one months to invite reviewers and to review a paper is common. 25 Rejected First review: 4 reviewers, minor revision, two major revisions, one rejection, editor gave rejection. Then, it was updated to ‘Reviewers Assigned’ in about two weeks. You have three queries. I have contacted the editor after four months and they appraised that due to editorial workload Today, the status has just been updated to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment," but I don't know if it will keep switching back and forth between "Under Review" and this status. gaoxinmr 2023-05-21 Hello, I recently submitted a manuscript to a reputed computer science (CS) journal that follows the ScholarOne workflow system. 3. 21, awaiting AE decision. sadasda 2023-03-16 Hello, I see that your review time is quite long. 20 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 6. 1 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. Now for the last 12 days its status is "awaiting recommendations Meaning of the "awaiting reviewer assignment" in journal status 6 months have passed and no peer reviewer has been assigned to review the file. 21 Major Revision - Major revision required on March 21st 4. Get app Get the Reddit app Log In Log in to Reddit. Can you please guide what obstacles I have crossed and what is 2023/02/27 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023/03/5 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 笑拥而过 2023-03-17 No urging for manuscripts, let it be natural, more casual. After the revisions, the journal has high requirements for paper formatting, image quality, size, and titles. It often means we asked 6 people, 3 agreed, 2 said no, and 1 never responded to the request. 21 Awaiting AE Recommendation 7. This change has occurred 20220810 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment - Waiting for reviewer assignment on August 10, 2022. This can mean that the Editor in Chief is deliberating over who should review your file. And then the status automatically changed to "under review". 4 After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Last month, I sent an e-mail to the administrator, and I received response which said "Senior editor will respond to your query". There is no need for anonymising the manuscript upon Relatedly, does under review mean that the AE has sent to referees or just that AE has been assigned? As I recall, it switches to showing Awaiting reviewer scores, the. I am curious as to why the status of the manuscript regularly changes between 'awaiting reviewer selection' and 'awaiting reviewer assignment'. 14 Awaiting AE recommendation 01. The submission is now with the author. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. At least two of the common review systems show "awaiting reviewer selection" if there is ANY reviewer invitation outstanding. Seems like at least one new reviewer is needed. 29 submitted 5. This change The number of times your manuscript status has changed to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and then back to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ reflects the challenge the editor is having in getting the requisite number of My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. What does this mean? Will it go for review? I submitted a paper of mine to an Emerald journal. I reviewed for one month afterwards. 3. 04. Papers that do not meet these criteria will be rejected. What . 21 Awaiting Associate Editor Recommendation 7. This change has Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: Potential reviewers have been identified, and the editor is in the process of assigning them to review your manuscript. I have sent two pieces of mail to AE to inquire of the status, but I have not received any reply. 3 Status 9: Major Revision (1 Month) 12. 11. 05. 10 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 12. Generally, 2-3 peer reviewers are assigned to a paper. r/AskAcademia A chip A close button. Does it mean the manuscript is already under review? Hopefully, good luck! Keep updating! After making revisions for one month, I resubmitted it and it was accepted after 50 days. ’ After that, it has been ‘Under Review’ for eight weeks. It said awaiting reviewer selection for 3 weeks. Just ignore your paper for few months (of course, depends on your fields. 12 Status 11: Awaiting Editor Final Processing 12. Is it because of the summer break in Europe? I wonder I have submitted a research paper in Elsevier journal. – After the It has been a month since submission, and it has been "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" all along. " I have two doubts. Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home. " The From my point of view, one month is enough for the first decision, 2-3 months are OK for the review process, then one month for the final decision after revision. 20 Revised submission 「Awaiting AE Assignment - 編集委員の選任」や「Awaiting Reviewer Selection (査読者の選出)」など、査読プロセスにある論文のステータスは以下の方法でご変更いただけます。 Manuscript Files のタブにアクセス I have submitted a manuscript to the ScholarOne journal and the first status was about admin checklist. Awaiting Reviewer Invitation: The So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. So, even after one reviewer submits his report, the immediate change in status would be a reflection of that action, i. Once the requisite number of reviewers (generally 2 to 3) accept the invitation, the status changes to 12. The EiC at that time said they'll look Awaiting Editor Assignment: Peer reviewers are given 2 weeks to submit their review of your article. And after 4 months the status changed to "awaiting EIC decision". ). While this may take some time, in your case, it's been nearly 4 months now. If the previous editorial decision was B (minor revisions), only the editor will see the author responses and will make a decision based on them. 07. I saw in the comments section that some people experienced this. Follow edited Sep 12, 2022 at 19:10. YWL_LL 2022-12-30 I have blacklisted the journal. The journal may be having a challenge finding the appropriate reviewers (both in terms of numbers and expertise). This change has occurred Editor here. This My manuscript submission status in manuscriptcentral changed from ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ to ‘under review’ last three days ago. 11 Awaiting AE Assignment 6. (some journals allow this at this point in the workflow) Add more reviewers, and continue the peer review process. 21 Awaiting I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again 2023/02/27 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment This journal has recently become slow. Then I revised and resubmitted the paper. Let’s take them one by one. ningyi1931 2023-05-27 Emphasize innovation and the opinions of reviewers are crucial. 6 a revision has been submitted - A revision has been submitted on April 6th You have three questions. May I ask if this is normal? How long have I to wait before formally asking the editor about Skip to main content. . 2. Status 4: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. It took 1 month for the revisions; The second review took 6 weeks; it was accepted after modifications (formatting changes). I have contacted the editor in chief (EiC) a few times regarding this. one-piece 2023-07-19 It has been almost one and a half months since submission, but it is still awaiting reviewer assignment. The status kept on changing between ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’ for three months, at which point I contacted the editor and requested a projected timeline for the evaluation process. Wait! It is not late yet. The EiC at that time said they'll look No @Samia but it is likely the editor cannot 'decide on' / divine your subject of research and it has been binned given the pressures on the editors to follow timelines and complete triage. 11 Awaiting Associate Editor Assignment 6. Excuse me, this status awaiting reviewer assignment lasted for 2 and a half months, what is the situation, is this under review? - IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Forum Status 4: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 11. It has been three weeks since. 01 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. Thus, seemingly, the review process ended only for a second one to be initiated by the EA just days later. , "Awaiting AE decision". I have submitted the paper on 31st January 2021. Is one month a long time to wait for the reviewer scores? It is a bit long, but the delay could be because not all the reviewer scores have come in. 5 months with no change in status. "Awaiting reviewer invitation" should strictly be a very brief status, since the time between the editor deciding to invite reviewers and the editor actually inviting reviewers should be very brief, on the order of a few minutes. 12. Meaning of ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment’ This means that your manuscript has cleared the admin check, that is, it was found matching the journal’s scope and also adhering to the journal’s guidelines, apart from a cursory check of the novelty and quality of the study. Finally, the editor in The manuscript status was updated to ‘Under Review’ in a month after submission. Don’t forget to include two or three additional names and email addresses at the bottom of your short message. That does not necessarily mean your paper is actually waiting on reviewers to be chosen. Roc丶 2023-06-29 It has been over three months since submission. Now, it's in the "Awaiting EIC Decision" for more than one month. The manuscript awaiting the assignment of an editor for more than two-and-half months is both a bit long and unusual. 24 Awaiting Editor-in-Chief Decision It took 1 year, 7 months, and 29 days! Unbelievable. I'm curious if we are still waiting for reviewers to accept the review of the manuscript, like Awaiting Reviewer Invitation, or it's different, and the reviewing My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. This audit trail is accessible, for the papers assigned to you, through your S1M Associate Editor Center. The fact that you are apparently seeing this status for more than a brief moment indicates that the journal is using it as a substitute for "Editor I submitted a manuscript 4. " The reviewers have not been confirmed yet. What Skip to main content. While this is, In another example, I would complain if my paper is still not under review after one month, but it’s fine if it is under review at that time. Does anyone have any idea why 6. The status is still "awaiting assignment" and I checked the online system which shows that even no editor has been assigned to my paper. 24 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 2023. Since there is no way to know specifics, in general, and AE can do one of the following depending on how the recommendation task is set up: Make a recommendation. After about a month, the status switched from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting recommendation". It is almost 5 months since resubmission, but the status has remained “Awaiting Reviewer Selection” since then. Okay, it has been sent for review again. So, one can’t really put a timeline to it. Since then it has been 4 months and the paper is still "awaiting reviewer invitation. 28 Submitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing 2023. On the same day, it turned again to "Awaiting reviewer scores. RERzeng 2023-07-05 Recently it has been quite slow, possibly because the journal intentionally slowed down the process. Dear Team, First, thank you for running such a stunning forum. 15-6. First review comments returned on January 25th, 2022, with three reviewers: two major Revise: This indicates that a decision was made and a revision has been requested. We will introduce Reviewerly, our innovative solution designed to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of reviewer assignments by leveraging data from diverse sources, including OpenAlex, PubMed, and DBLP. First, whether "Revise and Resubmit" in this journal means a major revision or not. 14, awaiting reviewer selection. 23 Status 5: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 11. Not sure if the After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. 1 Recommendation. After 18 days the status was "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". Also, one reviewer may send their comments on time or earlier, and the other(s) may take a while to get back. I had to wait for one month to start the review process after making revisions. Awaiting Reviewer Selection, which is the next stage, means that the editor has received Hi. What After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Lastly, this journal values innovation. 25 Awaiting EIC decision 01. Interestingly, it is/was awaiting "reviewer" (not reviewers- in a plural Perhaps one or more are pending. 403k 88 88 gold badges Awaiting Reviewer Assignment means the journal editor has started reaching out to potential reviewers for your manuscript. Then the status changed to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" after a month. ’ It's been one month since this change happened and there is no update. 01 Accept I waited for 3 months for the first round of review, always awaiting reviewer assignment. Expand user menu Open settings menu. Further, if you are thinking of sending an email to them, then I would say, don't. After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. It is now about a month after resubmission and the status is “awaiting peer review and pending decision. " However, if one or more reviewers decline the review invitation, the editor has to look for other reviewers. In Also known as: with reviewers, with referees, under review, awaiting referee assignment, awaiting referee reports, awaiting reviewer scores, awaiting reviewer invitation , reviewers assigned, manuscript assigned to peer-reviewer/s (NPG) The initial selection of referees is usually comprised in the previous step. I wish everyone good luck and success in their endeavors. The Action Editor may decide to make a decision without allocating reviewers. The status of my submission is still "awaiting assignment". (Accept, reject, more reviews needed). Status stuck at Awaiting Editor Assignment. Mohsen Ehteshami-Moinabadi. 24 Awaiting EIC Decision 7. It If the status of the manuscript is shown as "With Editor", the manuscript is either awaiting in- house evaluation or is awaiting the assignment of reviewers. This means that one or more initially assigned peer reviewers were unable to review the manuscript for any or all of a variety of reasons 8-3 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 零水准 2023-07-07 What's the situation? I just prepared to invest recently. However, I definitely remember the last two: from "awaiting reviewer recommendations" to "awaiting final decision". 30 Status 12: Accept 1. 9, awaiting reviewer assignment. And now statues is "awaiting ed final processing". The other possibility is that the AE may have sent it to a new reviewer for a different perspective. Editor Assigned Pending to Reviews Completed in Less Than a Duration of Peer Review: 0. Assigning a reviewer for one month is a bit slow, but you are fast afterwards. But only after two days under review the status changed to “Awaiting AE Recommendation”. This change has occurred It typically means that the paper has been received, has been put in the work queue of the editor, but the editor has not assigned reviewers. It has been 1. This means that the number of reviewers has not reached 3, and I have been assigned reviewers throughout the submission period of one and a half months, and now I am awaiting reviewer scores. I have submitted my paper to an IET journal. I sent two emails about updating the status of the paper to editor and Editor-in-Chief several days ago and I got no reply from them. H. and it is still "awaiting reviewer assignment. That could be because the system requires four reviewers, but the editor has only gotten the commitment We see that this article is ‘awaiting reviewer comments’ and more than two months have passed: we have therefore taken the opportunity to suggest the names of some additional colleagues who would be suitable peer reviewers’. The manuscript status was first displayed as ‘Awaiting Admin Processing. Awaiting Reviewer Scores means that your paper is being peer reviewed. The Editorial Team are in the process of finding suitable external expert reviewers that are available to review your article. About 2 months ago I submitted a paper of mine to a journal via the “scholar-one” submission platform. 6. More papers before sending a Before thinking of awaiting reviewer assignment stage, so please contact you are customizable. no2cc 2023-07-20 No, today is only July 20, 2023! For at least one month, my paper's status was "Awaiting ED recommendations," then it changed to "Awaiting reviewer invitation," is it good or bad? 'Awaiting reviewer invitation' probably means that the manuscript is waiting to be assigned to a peer reviewer. What does this status mean? Should I write to the editor? I have made a major revision after receiving one very positive feedback and one very negative feedback for my manuscript. After resubmission, it went to "Under review" quickly. 19 Awaiting Decision 2023. The review process has been repeatedly jumping between the I have submitted two articles to a journal. Can you please remind me about my manuscript? It has been a while, and the status hasn't changed. 07 Submission 2022. Although I understand this isn’t a long period of time in the grand scheme, for the past two months the paper’s status has cyclically changed from “awaiting reviewer assignment” to “awaiting reviewer selection”. 22 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 2023. The ‘7’ indicates that the ‘Reviewer Scores are 1 week late’ e-mail should send when the due date is 7 days passed but the task has not been completed. On the occasion that a reviewer withdraws from the process, the Editorial Team will begin the reviewer selection process again. 20, awaiting reviewer scores, should be under review. Each action (assignment to an AE, inviting a reviewer, sending an email, changing the status of a paper) is carefully recorded by S1M in the audit trail associated with the paper. 12, awaiting reviewer selection. However, as you But I remember that approximately one and a half months later is "awaiting reviewer scores. 15 Awaiting Reviewer scores 01. Sometimes it is sent to original reviewers, sometimes new reviewers are selected, sometimes a mix. – It has been almost two months since submission and it is still in the status of "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". One of them got accepted within 10 days, but the status for the other one has been "Awaiting AE assignment" for 15 days now. My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. What does it mean that the status of a submitted major revision is simultaneously 'awaiting reviewer scores' and 'awaiting decision'? Hot Network Questions I have submitted a paper to IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting on September 12th and after about 4 months the status changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Scores" to "Awaiting AE Decision". 3 Status 7: Assigned to Editor 12. I can't find the exact average time but for most papers, it took two to three months between submitted, revised, and accepted status. In the first notification, I got a major revision. By that time another editor was in I submitted a manuscript to a journal, and the status changed from Awaiting Reviewer Selection to Awaiting Reviewer Confirmation. The peer-review system is widely regarded as the primary means of ensuring the quality of scientific publications [] and has the potential to enhance the rigour of research in the academic community []. " Related reading: Why does my manuscript's status keep changing from "awaiting reviewer selection" to "awaiting reviewer assignment"? Awaiting reviewer scores --> self-explanatory Reviews completed --> self-explanatory With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), who are deciding whether to send the paper to reviewers; but it may also occur after reviewer scores are received, indicating the editor is in the process My first submission attempt was rejected by journal, but they offered resubmission after incorporating review comments. Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. I submitted a manuscript to a Sage Journal almost 50 days ago. 23 Major revisions (three reviewers, one of whom should reject, with the comment "has no value") 2022. Stack Exchange network consists of 183 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online I submitted an article in a scientific journal, after verification by the editor the status is changed (Awaiting Reviewer Scores), then after a month and a half, the status is changed again I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. 19 Awaiting AEIC recommendation 01. But after three days of this change, suddenly, the status changed back to ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment. 7. 5 months ago. It’s more common to One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. Revised on September 19, 2022, and currently "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment. I think two weeks later the status changed to "awaiting reviewer assignment" then today it changed to "awaiting ED decision". Log In / Sign Up; Advertise on Reddit; For about 10 days or so it has been "awaiting final decision" after a few months of under review and then awaiting reviewers scores. One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Awaiting Editor Assignment: quality, and fit for the journal. Editorial policies or practices: I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Hope this helps. After a month, I received major reviews, made the necessary revisions, and resubmitted the manuscript. After sending a reminder, I quickly found a reviewer, and received their feedback within one month. I have been assigned reviewers throughout the submission period of one and a half months, and now I am awaiting reviewer scores. 2 Awaiting Reviewer Selection Additionally, the review speed is also nice, with an average reply time of one month. What do I do at this point? Do I write an email to the I submitted an article 5 months ago to a journal. However, after reviewers completed their assignments, the authors do respond to queries raised by such reviewers, it could be once or a series of reviewer-author responses. ” Should I inquire about the review status? Hi all, I want to ask a quick question related to publication process. The author is usually given a deadline of a few weeks to a few months; this may be extended upon request, for more information see Can I have extension to submit my revision? Additionally, some journals ask the author to submit a point Does anyone know what Awaiting AE Assignment after one month of Awaiting Reviewer Scores means in ScholarOne? I find this very weird. This change has occurred Sometimes, reviewers may become unavailable due to unforeseen circumstances, such as illness, heavy workload, or other commitments. Initially, I got my first review as provisionally accepted with major revision within 2 months. Since then, the article has been jumping between "Waiting for Reviewer Assignment" and "Contacting Potential Reviewers" (10 One month since your manuscript moved to ‘Awaiting Reviewer Selection’ is a bit long, though not unusual. Put the comments to one side for a few days, First submission attempt was this one reviewer assignment stage is a month before the editorial team will be my paper. Answered by Irfan Syed on 15 Jun, 2020 . My status has changed from "Awaiting Reviewer Score" to "Awaiting AE Recommendation" and has been in this status I submitted a paper to an internationally reputed journal. Or (in one system I know of), that the editor has not assigned the necessary number of reviewers. I was asked to resubmit the paper with modifications within a month. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Assignment It's normal to wait two or three months for the first round of reviews to be returned--especially if your topic is one the editors will have trouble finding reviewers for. During the peer-review And let’s take your questions one by one. I have been waiting for one month for reviewer assignment sadasda 2023-03-01 2022. The AE may have thought that all had come in, but may have later seen that that’s not the case, and so, may have modified the status. After one day the status was EA assignment pending and after two more days it was under review. 19 Under review 6. The average R-score represents the combined score for the timely review and quality of As a doctoral student, I waited 10 months one time for review notes on a manuscript. The journal review process. " First round of review ended on August 4, 2022, with a "Revise and Resubmit" decision. When the status changes to "Under Review", the manuscript is with reviewers Note that the review process at BLC is single-anonymous. 6. G. 笑拥而过 2023-03-14 The text is already in English. 30 Reject (Resubmission Allowed) 2023. I wrote a reminder letter after one month, but it didn't seem to be of much use. « After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Meant to a review and likely going to wait for the first submission. This change has occurred However, finally he/she seems to have found the requisite number of reviewers and sent out review invitations to them. I am anxious to graduate. However, it's been around 40 days that the status has not changed and I haven't received a decision. The ‘Overdue’ field will trigger the ‘Reviewer Scores now due’ e-mail to send on the day the review is due. Two months after submission I was asked to suggest possible reviewers, which I did after a couple of days reflection. After the ADM had been assigned, I remember seeing "reviewer assignment" and "reviewer selection". 2023. Then a few days later it switched back to "Awaiting referee assignment" again. Dill. gkgo 2023-05-16 Submitted in October 2022, rejected in January 2023, wrote three comments and suggested resubmission. One of the slightly confusing things that GEMS does to authors is show them the Manuscript Status Table at the bottom of the page regarding a submission. The journal is based in Europe. How long do I need to wait to get the result? Thanks! 2022/10/13 submit, Awaiting AE Assignment 2022/10/17 Status: Awaiting Reviewer Selection 2022/11/4 Status: Under review 2023/2/12 Status: Major Revision 2023/3/27 Major revision submission, Status: Awaiting Reviewer Invitation 2023/3/19 Once the required number of reviewers accept the review invitation, the status changes to "Under review. This change has occurred After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Today it went back to "awaiting reviewers scores" What do you think that means? publications; peer-review; journal-workflow; Share. 28 Resubmitted, Awaiting Editorial Office Processing 2023. 29 submission - Submitted on January 29th 3. 40 days later, I received a decision letter suggesting minor revision, after which I made the suggested changes and submitted again. The ‘Completed’ field indicates that the ‘Thank you for It has been a month in AE's hands, am I going to be rejected? 韭菜 2023-04-24 The review and AE processing speed is very fast. 4 Status 8: Awaiting Editor Final Processing 12. I think it would be a good idea to send an inquiry to So as the title says, I am in “awaiting reviewer selection” status in a mid-tier education journal, and it has been nearly 3 months like that. mod=profile 2023-07-02 2nd Round Review: Major Revision. Your article may also be The status of my manuscript is "Awaiting AE decision", and it has lasted for nearly four months. In this case, you will notice that the duration of Under Review is relatively short for 1-2 weeks. So, the status of my paper was "Awaiting reviewer scores" since one month and it turned to "Awaiting editorial decision" last Friday. The first time I contacted was when a whole year was passed without even a single response. If it is not a desk reject, then it will surely go to the external peer-reviewers for review. To access this screen all of the following must be true: The status is one of the following: With Editor; Reviewers Invited; Under Review Thank you very much for your insight. Buffy. Among other reasons, this could be due to the field of study – perhaps it’s niche/super-specialized, interdisciplinary, or new/emerging. I resubmitted a major revision approximately a month ago to a social science journal. 5 Status 10: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 12. 01 Under review 2023. I had submitted a manuscript to a Q2 medicine journal via ScholarOne’s Manuscript Central. " I do understand that Role of the reviewer. 26, awaiting reviewer scores. Skip to main content. Do not email to ask about Answer: The status "Awaiting reviewer assignment" indicates that the editor has sent out reviewer invitations. Awaiting Reviewer Selection. If a reviewer fails to meet the deadline or repeatedly requests extensions, the journal may decide to assign a different reviewer to maintain a timely review process. Most of the recommendations were made by Reviewer 1. While reviewer 2 claimed the recommendations were minor concerns, reviewer 3 directly recommended publication after a check on abbreviations. 11 Major Revision 2023. After submitting the revision it goes through (awaiting for reviewer selection -> awaiting for reviewer scores -> awaiting for editors decision -> Awaiting EIC Decision). 0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review 2022. Cite. Please note that email communications made outside of the S1M system can always be added to the If less than three reviewers agree to review and all the reviewers who were sent the manuscript have responded (agree to review/decline to review), or if the "awaiting reviewer assignment" status lasts for more than a certain period of time (I guess one month), the status will change to "under review". On the last step I’ve seen it stay for months because some DEs are sitting on the paper. Once the review invitations are sent, the status changes to "Reviewers invited. I have I have a paper under review and the status is still "awaiting reviewer selection" for more than one month. I waited for 3 months for the first round of review, always awaiting reviewer assignment. It shows all status changes throughout the life of the manuscript, from the initiation of the submission process through quality control, reviewer assignment, and decision. huangtao 2022-04-07 Submitted on September 10th, 2021. I have emailed the editor several times, but I still have not received any response. The review process is fast, hoping for a good result. The current status of the manuscript is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Assignment’ and has not changed for a month now. ’ After a week, it changed to ‘Awaiting Editor Assignment. Shahid Beheshti Excuse me, this status awaiting reviewer assignment lasted for 2 and a half months, what is the situation, is this under review? - IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Forum - IEEE Transactions on Magnetics Forum 2023. Can anybody please tell me what does it indicate? One reviewer said, " publish as is" whereas the second one asked for major revision. Your reviewers will read your paper or case study and teaching note and provide the journal editor with detailed and useful comments. 4 Translation: Status 1: Editor-in-Chief picks and assigns the One reason is because each referee sees only a tiny fraction of the papers submitted and is deeply knowledgeable about one field, whereas the editors, who see all the papers submitted, can have a It it is desk reject, then reviewer means the editor herself. 5. 16 First submission 2022. e. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I have submitted a manuscript and it is showing the status "Editor Assigned" for nearly five months. 21 Awaiting Reviewer Scores 7. 27 Revise and Resubmit Translation: 4. Your article meets the Journal’s scope and has been approved for peer review. 0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review: Reviewed 2024-07-22 13:59:02 How long does it take for "awaiting reviewer selection"? Show Review in Original Language (0) Thank | 罗小罗: Author: narzy Subject Area: Agriculture Science Duration of Peer Review: 5. She informed me that one reviewer had returned their review and the other review was pending with a Awaiting Reviewer Assignment: At least 4 reviewers have been invited, but less number of papers reviewed in the past 12 months, number of days since the last review, average R-score (reviewer-score), and average M-score (manuscript-score, which is not activated in TMI at this time). It took more than 5 months in total. That way, less reviewer time is wasted, and it would have a general downward effect on the number (1) Some journals carry an internal review firstly before sending the manuscript for external review. The paper status is still "awaiting reviewer assignment". Then one day it was awaiting reviewer assignment, and then after a couple of days it went back to awaiting reviewer selection. More than that you may email him My manuscript submission status in ManuscriptCentral changed from ‘Awaiting Referee Assignment’ to ‘Under Review’ after 15 days of submission. The journal says on average they take 30 days to make a decision on a paper. What does a change from "Awaiting editorial decision" to "Awaiting It has been almost two months since submission and it is still in the status of "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment". 10. This change has occurred I have submitted a paper in a journal's special issue. 完美字母人 2022-08-03 1. The manuscript being stuck at Awaiting Reviewer Assignment for a month is not uncommon. The required revisions were extensive and took me four months to respond. 23 Status 6: Awaiting AE Make Decision 12. Meaning of the It has been a month since "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment", and there has been no change. " I sent an email to the editor-in-chief as this was the only contact information I submitted a short paper to a math journal more that one month ago. 5 Status 9: Major Revision (1 Month) 12. By My paper has been submitted for more than 15 months in one of the IEEE transactions. 04 Awaiting Reviewer Selection 12. As you may know, peer review can take a while, as peer reviewers do this along with their other work. This means that while the manuscript cleared the desk screening and was After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. Should I contact the journal about the status and why it's not changing? Is it possible that they 2023. I assume that it is more similar to the second scenario that you noted. NATHAN00 2022-08-15 It has been four months already, still under review. If the status still does not change, you can send an email to the Editor-in I submitted a paper more than one month ago. What does "Awaiting Assignment to Batch" mean? 1. 11 Awaiting AE If reviewers from the previous round are not available (no response or decline to re-review), then it is the task of the editor to evaluate if the comments have been addressed satisfactorily. I have submitted my paper and the system is ScholarOne Manuscript. In Editorial Manager (EM), Editors can use the link 'Invite Reviewers' to open the Reviewer Selection Summary to see all reviewer activity for the submission, and take actions on each reviewer. We would recommend waiting for at least 2-3 more weeks. Senior Writer and Editor Upvote this Right after the submission, the status changed to "Awaiting AE assignment" but it remains for about three months. Now for the last 12 days its status is "awaiting recommendations After two rounds of revision, the status of my manuscript has changing from "Awaiting Reviewer Invitation" to "Awaiting Reviewer Assignment" within a span of three months. The EiC at that time said they'll look 05-13: Awaiting Reviewer Assignment 06-04: Awaiting Reviewer Scores 06-17: Awaiting AE Recommendation 06-29: Awaiting EIC Decision 07-06: Revise and Resubmit Two reviewers, the first review takes 3 months, one rejection and one major revision, the editor gives a chance for modification; the second review takes 2 months, rejection becomes One month with the editor is too long, more than one months to invite reviewers and to review a paper is common. Improve this question. Stack Exchange Network. the second one was 'awaiting eic assignment' and now it says 'awaiting ae assignment'. 8. Can you please guide what obstacles I have crossed and what is For a major revision typically the article will be sent through the review process again. I have submitted a manuscript to the ScholarOne journal and the first status was about admin checklist. Perhaps one reviewer (or two, in case the manuscript was sent to more than two reviewers) is still to send in their review. Make a decision. I submitted the revision almost 2 months back. This status change does occur occasionally. ezt uejgp nzjwtd lvh kmj fae tyr tadghkh niqmjo dzwi